Hard not to like Margot Robbie as Harley Quinn. The story is a relatively mundane mashup of elements like heartbreak, revenge, theft, and the like. All combined with a difficult-at-times mix of surprisingly harsh violence, wackiness, and comedy.
It’s fast and entertaining but is perhaps a bit lighthearted and comic-like rather than comic book compared to other DC movies. Admittedly, most of those are poor at best so this is an achievement.
Some elements are great. The fairground showdown is a great mix of cartoon and grim violence and choreography.
Some elements are terrible. Ewan mcgregor as ‘black mask’ for example. There’s a good Begbie-like unpredictable note of viciousness. But only now and again. Most of the time it’s more Robbie Rotten. Victor Zsasz? More like ‘moody henchman’.
The rest of the Birds of Prey aren’t made enough of. The exposition from Harley is helpful, but we don’t get to gauge how reliable it is. some of the BoP action is a bit low-budget-TV which doesn’t suit the good cast and potential for outlandish mayhem that would be possible. Huntress and the bike-car chase could’ve been more engaging. There’s a really constrained feeling to all the scenes. This works in the club for example, but some of the street scenes reminded me of Batman (Michael Keaton): OK, but more impressionist than realist.
It’s an OK movie. Worth watching for some fun scenes and Margot Robbie as Harley.
If you liked suicide squad this is a step-up, but similarly pitched. Otherwise, you might give it a go but think generously.
Solid movie about a successful American and an understated Brit trying to give Ford Motors the innovation they asked for.
As an example of how firms beg for innovation and then resist it at nearly all costs this should be cut down to about 30 minutes and used to replace numerous ‘innovation’ and other training courses. Far more fun and possibly far more effective.
As a story, it is well told and engaging. Even better, it ends as it should.
Some terrifying racing scenes and vicious competition make for some very tense viewing.
I saw it in ScreenX. The extended scenes created immersion in the racing.
Well worth seeing.
5 is perhaps too generous. But 4 seemed too mean.
I saw this at a Cineworld Unlimited preview.
Sadly, this film is a bit of a sprawling mess. It has lots of good film ingredients: a good cast; locations, locations, locations; easily identifiable villains and heroes; a light sprinkling of subterfuge; humour; and some glamour. Those things are spread all over the place though. And the characters are a bit…superficial. A shame, as the characters and their interaction made the TV series and the earlier movies.
There are some good touches of the TV series in the visit to the ‘stone quarry’. Unsure why ‘quarry’ is qualified, but it’s likely another idiom I’m missing. Great fun and pretty dirty fighting offset by some barely credible tension.
I won’t mention Patrick Stewart. No idea where his character was meant to be from.
Things are a bit grislier than the old TV show: impaling, some pretty rough fights, and some death.
It felt very long. Too long.
Go see frozen 2 instead. More credible story and stronger, more well-formed characters.
Slightly guilty at giving this 5/10. It has some really good high-concept sci-fi stuff, a sterling performance from Brad Pitt, and some persuasive effects. Why 5/10? Well, the backstory: dad’s missing/out of touch on Neptune; 16 years ago; drones haven’t found him but sending his son on a jaunt out there will? Mmm. Plus, moon-pirates in moon-buggies? Really? And a variety of nonsense scattered about. Brad’s dad is played hilariously by tommy lee Jones. Maybe being out at the edge has broken him, but his character doesn’t really work for me. The ending is also a bit of a non-event. Resolution, but not very…dramatic.
My enjoyment was also marred by a man-child in the front row who kept checking his huge, super-bright iPhone every few minutes, taking time to read and update his social circle. Well, that was when he wasn’t checking his super-bright Apple Watch. 🙄
Wow. No superheroes. No video game-like CGI. And wonderfully misleading at times.
A great Joker origin story that sits in a grim Gotham not far from Frank Miller’s Dark Knight.
Really compelling character arc that brought me along with it and left me feeing admiration and disgust.
You really have to see this.
A weak story poorly told.
You’ve seen dozens of TV movies like this already. Someone trapped by their own bad choices and the corruption of a few folks in the system.
This is no exception. It’s concisely told. But that doesn’t make it any less poor than any of the others. Ignore it and it might go away.
only 6/10? Well it could have been so much more in a somewhat shorter time.
This is a good children’s movie that gets across a lot of the content of the novel on which it is based.
However, like many such properties it fails to capture the essentials only and instead rumbles on in a long literal exposition. Think later Harry Potter movies: all well and good but…
Like most Spielberg films for children it touches on mawkish at times but also has a gentle touch when it comes to peril and violence.
As you’d expect, its video game influences are wide ranging and very strong. And yet after a few minutes of Oasis-based footage you get used to it. The frequent back to the future references, the different pop culture content, and the stylised VR look all join together to make it pretty consistent and slick.
The bad guys are bad and yet not vicious. The good guys remind me of the goonies. And the ending is suitably Spielberg and reassuring.
This is a fair interpretation of the novel. It won’t satisfy folks wanting a darker, Matrix-like interpretation but it will satisfy and perhaps delight Spielberg fans and folks wanting a pop-culture inspired tale of good over evil.